<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jay Severin&#8217;s dumb-ass-ity, in his own words</title>
	<atom:link href="http://severinwatch.com/2009/09/09/jay-severins-dumb-ass-ity-in-his-own-words/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://severinwatch.com/2009/09/09/jay-severins-dumb-ass-ity-in-his-own-words/</link>
	<description>Keeping an eye (and ear) on Jay Severin</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 02:53:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidFromBrighton</title>
		<link>http://severinwatch.com/2009/09/09/jay-severins-dumb-ass-ity-in-his-own-words/comment-page-1/#comment-4308</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidFromBrighton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://severinwatch.com/2009/09/09/jay-severins-dumb-ass-ity-in-his-own-words/#comment-4308</guid>
		<description>Steve, I welcome your contribution but I&#039;m not sure what point you&#039;re trying to make. Are you defending what Jay Severin said or agreeing that his remarks were self-contradictory? Are you in favor of a public option or against it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, I welcome your contribution but I&#8217;m not sure what point you&#8217;re trying to make. Are you defending what Jay Severin said or agreeing that his remarks were self-contradictory? Are you in favor of a public option or against it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://severinwatch.com/2009/09/09/jay-severins-dumb-ass-ity-in-his-own-words/comment-page-1/#comment-4307</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://severinwatch.com/2009/09/09/jay-severins-dumb-ass-ity-in-his-own-words/#comment-4307</guid>
		<description>You are naive if you think business people are not in business to make money. Corporations are regularly sued by their shareholders if they do not make the most money they can. Businesses hire illegal immigrants so they can pay them as little as possible. If it weren&#039;t against the law, business owners would be in favor of slavery. Most health insurance has been won by unions in contract negotiations, not offered freely by businesses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are naive if you think business people are not in business to make money. Corporations are regularly sued by their shareholders if they do not make the most money they can. Businesses hire illegal immigrants so they can pay them as little as possible. If it weren&#8217;t against the law, business owners would be in favor of slavery. Most health insurance has been won by unions in contract negotiations, not offered freely by businesses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Herbert Glover</title>
		<link>http://severinwatch.com/2009/09/09/jay-severins-dumb-ass-ity-in-his-own-words/comment-page-1/#comment-4256</link>
		<dc:creator>Herbert Glover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 00:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://severinwatch.com/2009/09/09/jay-severins-dumb-ass-ity-in-his-own-words/#comment-4256</guid>
		<description>Another thing also Tim, he tells his callers that his show has more ratings than MSNBC, and the scary part, is that he is serious, and his callers beleive him....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another thing also Tim, he tells his callers that his show has more ratings than MSNBC, and the scary part, is that he is serious, and his callers beleive him&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Herbert Glover</title>
		<link>http://severinwatch.com/2009/09/09/jay-severins-dumb-ass-ity-in-his-own-words/comment-page-1/#comment-4255</link>
		<dc:creator>Herbert Glover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 00:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://severinwatch.com/2009/09/09/jay-severins-dumb-ass-ity-in-his-own-words/#comment-4255</guid>
		<description>Well said, Mr. Tim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said, Mr. Tim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://severinwatch.com/2009/09/09/jay-severins-dumb-ass-ity-in-his-own-words/comment-page-1/#comment-4250</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://severinwatch.com/2009/09/09/jay-severins-dumb-ass-ity-in-his-own-words/#comment-4250</guid>
		<description>David, thanks for keeping tabs on this intellectually and morally bankrupt tool. 

Severin a pompous dimwit when it comes to health care and many other topics.  His sour combination of arrogance and incompetence makes me want to hurl. 

As an obvious ratings whore, you&#039;d think that Jay would realize that small business owners are a key demographic for him. Or that small businesses are getting killed by health care premiums that have doubled since George W. Bush took office.  But I guess that&#039;s not in the playbook he&#039;s reading from.  For Severin, some things are even more important than ratings. Like echoing corporate lobbiests&#039; talking points word for word.  

But as someone who used to work in radio, the thing that bothers me most about Serverin isn&#039;t his political views.  It&#039;s the fact that in terms of the content and production, his show sucks.  

Severin rarely informs. He&#039;s a propagandist, not an educator. All the news that fits, he says.  Anything that is outside his very concrete and formulaic agenda, he avoids.  Maybe that worked in Mao&#039;s China or the Soviet Union (after all, what other choice did they have?),  but in a free society it&#039;s a recipe for painfully boring radio. 

More often than not Jay is behind news events, not ahead of them. He rarely has an interesting guest on the show. If he does have a guest, it is someone with views identical to his own, and since he is - in truth - a wimp,  he is pathetically deferential to them. (If the guest is in the studio with him, Jay grovels to the point of requiring knee pads).  Most of his callers, who don&#039;t seem to be very bright at all,  monotonously agree with him.  He treats the ones who don&#039;t with often cruel disrespect and hangs up on them. His skin is as thin as a Kleenex in a downpour. 

I was excited when Severin got suspended because I enjoy and appreciate Michael Smirconich&#039;s show.  In contrast to Severin&#039;s POS,  Smirconich&#039;s  show is interesting, informative, and well- produced.  Although he is allegedly conservative, Smirconich doesn&#039;t wear his politics on his sleeve and is an independent thinker, not a propagandist shill like Severin.  Smirconich is ahead of the news, not behind it, and he gets live interviews with the newsmakers themselves.  Unlike Severin, he has the guts to honestly engage with people on all sides of the issue in a civil and respectful manner.  He keeps the show moving and hits on multiple timely topics. 

I really wish that someone would pick up Smirconich&#039;s show in Boston.  Severin&#039;s ratings are in the gutter these days. But  Smirconich would bury him for good in the ratings department, and for a whole lot less money. 

With the speech-to-text technology now available at low cost, I wish someone would put up complete transcripts of Jay Severin&#039;s show on the web for all to see. His words alone are indelible proof of how compromised and disturbed this buffoon really is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, thanks for keeping tabs on this intellectually and morally bankrupt tool. </p>
<p>Severin a pompous dimwit when it comes to health care and many other topics.  His sour combination of arrogance and incompetence makes me want to hurl. </p>
<p>As an obvious ratings whore, you&#8217;d think that Jay would realize that small business owners are a key demographic for him. Or that small businesses are getting killed by health care premiums that have doubled since George W. Bush took office.  But I guess that&#8217;s not in the playbook he&#8217;s reading from.  For Severin, some things are even more important than ratings. Like echoing corporate lobbiests&#8217; talking points word for word.  </p>
<p>But as someone who used to work in radio, the thing that bothers me most about Serverin isn&#8217;t his political views.  It&#8217;s the fact that in terms of the content and production, his show sucks.  </p>
<p>Severin rarely informs. He&#8217;s a propagandist, not an educator. All the news that fits, he says.  Anything that is outside his very concrete and formulaic agenda, he avoids.  Maybe that worked in Mao&#8217;s China or the Soviet Union (after all, what other choice did they have?),  but in a free society it&#8217;s a recipe for painfully boring radio. </p>
<p>More often than not Jay is behind news events, not ahead of them. He rarely has an interesting guest on the show. If he does have a guest, it is someone with views identical to his own, and since he is &#8211; in truth &#8211; a wimp,  he is pathetically deferential to them. (If the guest is in the studio with him, Jay grovels to the point of requiring knee pads).  Most of his callers, who don&#8217;t seem to be very bright at all,  monotonously agree with him.  He treats the ones who don&#8217;t with often cruel disrespect and hangs up on them. His skin is as thin as a Kleenex in a downpour. </p>
<p>I was excited when Severin got suspended because I enjoy and appreciate Michael Smirconich&#8217;s show.  In contrast to Severin&#8217;s POS,  Smirconich&#8217;s  show is interesting, informative, and well- produced.  Although he is allegedly conservative, Smirconich doesn&#8217;t wear his politics on his sleeve and is an independent thinker, not a propagandist shill like Severin.  Smirconich is ahead of the news, not behind it, and he gets live interviews with the newsmakers themselves.  Unlike Severin, he has the guts to honestly engage with people on all sides of the issue in a civil and respectful manner.  He keeps the show moving and hits on multiple timely topics. </p>
<p>I really wish that someone would pick up Smirconich&#8217;s show in Boston.  Severin&#8217;s ratings are in the gutter these days. But  Smirconich would bury him for good in the ratings department, and for a whole lot less money. </p>
<p>With the speech-to-text technology now available at low cost, I wish someone would put up complete transcripts of Jay Severin&#8217;s show on the web for all to see. His words alone are indelible proof of how compromised and disturbed this buffoon really is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lynnrockets</title>
		<link>http://severinwatch.com/2009/09/09/jay-severins-dumb-ass-ity-in-his-own-words/comment-page-1/#comment-4205</link>
		<dc:creator>lynnrockets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://severinwatch.com/2009/09/09/jay-severins-dumb-ass-ity-in-his-own-words/#comment-4205</guid>
		<description>Severin is a simple minded buffoon. One of the first misconceptions that he vomits over the airwaves is that &quot;public option&quot; services will be free. Such is not the case. In every current proposal, people will have to pay premiums towards the &quot;public option&quot; just like private plans. Hopefully, however those premiums will and should be less than in private plans.

The FedX analogy is ridiculous because the U.S. Postal Service is a pay for service &quot;public option&quot; that has not driven FedX and UPS out of business. To the contrary, those private entities had to streamline their services to make them less costly and more efficient than the postal service. This is precisely the goal of a public option health plan. To encourage private insurers to streamline services and make them less costly to the consumer.

Of course if you tried to explain this to Severin on air, he would simply cut off the call, call you a name (i.e. Peter Pan) and then mis-characterize your argument to his less than intelligent audience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Severin is a simple minded buffoon. One of the first misconceptions that he vomits over the airwaves is that &#8220;public option&#8221; services will be free. Such is not the case. In every current proposal, people will have to pay premiums towards the &#8220;public option&#8221; just like private plans. Hopefully, however those premiums will and should be less than in private plans.</p>
<p>The FedX analogy is ridiculous because the U.S. Postal Service is a pay for service &#8220;public option&#8221; that has not driven FedX and UPS out of business. To the contrary, those private entities had to streamline their services to make them less costly and more efficient than the postal service. This is precisely the goal of a public option health plan. To encourage private insurers to streamline services and make them less costly to the consumer.</p>
<p>Of course if you tried to explain this to Severin on air, he would simply cut off the call, call you a name (i.e. Peter Pan) and then mis-characterize your argument to his less than intelligent audience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://severinwatch.com/2009/09/09/jay-severins-dumb-ass-ity-in-his-own-words/comment-page-1/#comment-4142</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 16:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://severinwatch.com/2009/09/09/jay-severins-dumb-ass-ity-in-his-own-words/#comment-4142</guid>
		<description>Where in heaven&#039;s name did he get the idea that the public option would be free??? From what I&#039;ve been reading/hearing, any government run option would offer only bare bones coverage and have to pay for itself through premiums. Oh wait, I forgot; Jay makes stuff up and states it as fact.

Oh, and I missed the part of the U.S. Constitution that bestows upon private business the right to do &quot;whatever it wants to do, pretty much whatever it wants to do&quot;. Maybe it&#039;s in the Declaration of Independence?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where in heaven&#8217;s name did he get the idea that the public option would be free??? From what I&#8217;ve been reading/hearing, any government run option would offer only bare bones coverage and have to pay for itself through premiums. Oh wait, I forgot; Jay makes stuff up and states it as fact.</p>
<p>Oh, and I missed the part of the U.S. Constitution that bestows upon private business the right to do &#8220;whatever it wants to do, pretty much whatever it wants to do&#8221;. Maybe it&#8217;s in the Declaration of Independence?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://severinwatch.com/2009/09/09/jay-severins-dumb-ass-ity-in-his-own-words/comment-page-1/#comment-4141</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://severinwatch.com/2009/09/09/jay-severins-dumb-ass-ity-in-his-own-words/#comment-4141</guid>
		<description>Totally with you Dave- I cannot fathom why people actually tune in to Jay for news/information/advice.   I guess I would want to know how a small business owner calculates salaries for his/her employees.  I have to imagine that if an owner is saving/making more money, then his employees will benefit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally with you Dave- I cannot fathom why people actually tune in to Jay for news/information/advice.   I guess I would want to know how a small business owner calculates salaries for his/her employees.  I have to imagine that if an owner is saving/making more money, then his employees will benefit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
